Skip to content
Independent reporting
, ,

The Red-Letter Trap: When Christians Use Jesus To Ignore The Bible

The Red-Letter Trap: When Christians Use Jesus To Ignore The Bible
Share X Facebook Email

“I don’t know what Bibles you read… It served me well when I picked up the ‘Red Letter’ version of the Bible, because I could ignore all of those little black words.”

That remarkable statement, attributed to Dr. Neil G. Thomas of the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas, Texas, captures a growing approach to Christianity that sounds deeply devoted to Jesus while potentially undermining the authority of the very Bible that reveals Him.

The problem isn’t the red-letter Bible. Highlighting the recorded words of Jesus can be a wonderful study tool. Generations of Christians have used red-letter editions without ever imagining that the rest of Scripture mattered less.

The problem begins when the color of the ink becomes a hierarchy of authority.

Jesus said it, therefore it matters. Paul said it, therefore perhaps it doesn’t. Moses wrote it, so maybe we’ve moved beyond it. If a difficult biblical teaching conflicts with our modern understanding of compassion, sexuality, morality or justice, simply retreat to the red letters.

But there is an enormous problem with that approach.

Jesus Himself didn’t treat Scripture that way.

When Satan tempted Christ in the wilderness, Jesus repeatedly responded with three words: “It is written.”

He wasn’t quoting red letters. He was quoting Deuteronomy.

When discussing Scripture elsewhere, Jesus declared, “Scripture cannot be broken” (John 10:35). In His prayer to the Father, He said, “Your word is truth” (John 17:17).

Jesus did not present Himself as rescuing people from the authority of Scripture. He consistently affirmed it.

And that creates an uncomfortable question for modern Christians who want Jesus without all those inconvenient “black words”:

How can we claim to follow Jesus while rejecting the Scriptures Jesus affirmed?

Jesus Didn’t Write The Red Letters

There is another irony that is often overlooked.

Jesus didn’t personally write the Gospel of Matthew.

He didn’t personally write Mark, Luke or John either.

The sayings printed in red in modern Bibles were preserved for us by inspired human authors. Matthew recorded Jesus saying, “Love your enemies.” John recorded Jesus saying, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.”

We trust those statements because we trust the inspired testimony of Scripture.

So why does Matthew suddenly become less authoritative when the printer changes the ink from red back to black?

The color is typography.

The authority comes from God.

Red-letter editions of the Bible didn’t even exist for most of Christian history. The distinction is a publishing convention designed to help readers quickly identify quotations attributed to Christ. It was never intended to establish different levels of inspiration.

Yet that is effectively what happens when Christians begin treating the words of Jesus as a Bible within the Bible.

This becomes especially obvious when the discussion turns to the Apostle Paul.

A popular approach in progressive Christianity portrays Jesus as the compassionate teacher of love and inclusion while Paul becomes the stern theologian responsible for inconvenient doctrines involving sexuality, church discipline, gender, judgment and Christian conduct.

When Paul becomes uncomfortable, Jesus becomes the escape hatch.

“Jesus never said anything about that.”

But that argument ignores something important: Jesus deliberately appointed apostles to teach His Church.

Before His crucifixion, Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would guide His disciples into truth. After His resurrection, He commissioned them to make disciples and teach believers to obey what He had commanded.

Paul likewise insisted that the Gospel he preached was not something he invented. He wrote that he received it “through the revelation of Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:12).

Peter went even further, referring to Paul’s writings alongside “the other Scriptures” (2 Peter 3:16).

The New Testament does not present Jesus and His apostles as theological competitors.

It presents the apostles as Christ’s authorized witnesses.

var images = [],
index = 0;
images[0] = ““;
images[1] = “
“;
images[2] = “
“;
images[3] = “
“;
index = Math.floor(Math.random() * images.length);
document.write(images[index]);
//done

The Sanitized Jesus Doesn’t Exist

There is another problem with trying to build Christianity exclusively from the red letters.

Share X Facebook Email

The Kingdom Watch Brief

The day’s essential headlines, without the noise.

A concise briefing delivered directly to your inbox.

Free to join. Unsubscribe any time.

Powered by Reach Response